Album Review: The Beatles – Beatles for Sale (1964)


Rating: 8/10

The Beatles’ 4th release is a concept album about love and the male ego standing in the way of that. Sung from the masculine perspective, it starts out with the protagonist lashing out with paranoia and suspicion at his loved one. Accusations of infidelity are thrown, but at the same time it’s hard to side with him since we never really get her side of the story. She’s thoroughly absent, giving no reply. The creepy undertones certainly don’t help his case (“I know where you’ve been / I saw you walk in your door”). I’m a Loser then finds him in the post-breakup self-pitying mood. Heartbreak and hopes for a make-up dominate Baby’s in Black as well, and again we get a dark vibe due to the color being associated directly with her. He then turns to rock ‘n’ roll music as a distraction – he rocks and dances his problems away. It works because a more positive outlook on life is already adopted with the next song, I’ll Follow the Sun, which uses the star as a metaphor for chasing happiness in different places. The same idea is amplified on Mr. Moonlight – the ‘love’ word is brought back, but this time attributed to something else other than a human being. He has finally learned to enjoy life beyond her. Being a changed man, the protagonist returns to Kansas City to get his baby back home. He even feels that butterflies-in-stomach euphoric feel of being in love again that can’t be properly articulated (Hey, Hey, Hey, Hey).

They get back together and the relationship works again. He tells her he loves her even more than is humanly possible (Eight Days a Week). The hyper-excitement calms down a bit as the initial phase passes, but the atmosphere is still as romantic as can be (Words of Love). Then something happens. On Honey Don’t it is again unclear who did wrong to whom, but the fact that he thinks he has the nerve to tell her what to do comes in the way. He becomes possessive. On the surface, Every Little Thing sounds like another enthusiastic love song, but notice how the perspective changes – “eight days a week I love you” becomes “every little thing she does, she does for me”. It becomes more about him, about how he’s viewed by his friends. By the time of I Don’t Want to Spoil the Party he’s disappointed, lonely and drunk. He’s ruined it again. On What You’re Doing the protagonist alternates between self-pitying (“I’m feeling blue and lonely”), blaming her (“What you’re doing to me?”) and adopting the she-doesn’t-know-what-she’s-lost attitude (“Should you need a love that’s true – it’s me”). And finally, Everybody’s Trying to Be My Baby concludes the album with the idea that there are plenty more fish in the sea (50, apparently, and they’re all knocking at his door). Whether that’s really true, or just the protagonist comforting himself we can’t tell. Will future relationships work out for him? The ending is open.

Naturally, this is my own interpretation and should not be taken as fact. I’ve yet to read any proof that The Beatles intended the album to be anything more than a collection of songs, but that doesn’t necessarily exclude a subconscious decision of writing about certain things and placing those ideas in a certain order. Beatles for Sale has always felt to me like a step up in many ways, with the song-writing themes more varied and the personalities of Paul and especially John more involved in the process. Sure, some cover choices are questionable. And maybe you’ll find my whole analysis way far-fetched. But only great albums leave space for such interpretation, and Beatles for Sale is definitely one of them.


Categories: Album Reviews


23 replies

  1. Great album? Yes. Concept album? I doubt it! If you look at any pop album from that time or before, the overwhelming majority were full of songs about teenagers, love, teenagers in love, teenagers out of love, teenagers hurt by love, etc. The concept of the concept album didn’t really start for a few more years, with albums like Days Of Future Passed, by the Moody Blues. Interesting analysis, but from one who was around at the time, we didn’t see it that way and I doubt the Fab Four did either. Loved the old video, a real memory jerker! Great post, too 😊

    Liked by 1 person

  2. A great perspective on that album. It was the last of the boys first phase. After that the music became more complex. I think it’s a coincidence that it’s all about love. That was the preoccupation of Rock then. They hadn’t moved on to other themes. It was Dylan who introduced that possibility.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Yep.For all Lennon’s later talk of peace and love he could still be a right selfish git when he wanted to. But, bless his music all the same

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Two quick comments: for some reason, No Reply was the song that gave me wholly to the Beatles. I remember everything about the time I’ve first heard it. One of those things. Also, their amazing harmonies on Baby’s Black were somehow emulated later on by Badfinger’s No Matter What.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Courting controversy here, but this might just be the best album that Beatles lot put out.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Yeah, I think the concept idea is a bit of a stretch, as Ovidiu himself admits. The closest they ever came was Sgt. Pepper. And that was just them pretending to be another band with no storyline pulling it all together. Lennon himself said any of the songs could have been on any album. I’ve often wondered what a true Beatles concept album (a la Tommy) might have sounded like. But I think Lennon and McCartney were so entrenched in the 3 minute single that they just didn’t process music that way. Not even in their solo years.


  7. One of the great things about music – and all art for that matter – is that the interpretation is left to the patron. I find Ovidiu’s interpretation much more imaginative than my own. Well-written and fun.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. This is such a fascinating interpretation and so much fun to read. You’re a really skilled writer!

    Liked by 1 person

  9. An interesting spin on their worst album Ovi! Maybe the weight (“the start of Lennon’s fat period”) of the concept held them back, or adding another spin, maybe the concept was to release a collection of shit songs. I’m kidding of course, it’s not that bad.

    Good read buddy!

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Very interesting! I’ve never read an album review written this way before. I’ve also never considered the “concept” thing on the Beatles, but you make me want to listen to the full album now. Great post!

    Liked by 1 person


  1. The Zombies – She’s Not There (Song Review) – Tangled Up In Music

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: